Current:Home > ContactWisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal -AssetLink
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:57:42
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine’s use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities refuted those claims and defended the legality of the van, saying there was no specific prohibition against it.
The lawsuit over the mobile voting van is one of several in battleground Wisconsin that could affect voting rules in the upcoming presidential election.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, Racine City Clerk Tara McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled across the city to meet voters in their neighborhoods and collect early ballots.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. They argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the November election that year, saying that there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. That led the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to then file its lawsuit.
Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, in a ruling late Monday, overturned the elections commission’s dismissal of the complaint, saying state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
“Nowhere can this Court find or has been provided any authority allowing the use of a van or vehicle as an alternate absentee voting vehicle,” the judge wrote.
He rejected the argument from defendants that the use of mobile voting sites was allowable because there is no specific prohibition against them.
The judge said his ruling wasn’t a determination on whether mobile voting sites were a good idea or not. That is up to the Legislature to decide, Gasiorkiewicz said.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state Department of Justice, which represented it in the lawsuit, did not return messages seeking comment on whether the decision will be appealed. McMenamin was in a meeting Tuesday and did not return a message seeking comment.
Early in-person absentee voting in Wisconsin for the municipal spring election begins Feb. 6. The presidential primary is April 2, with absentee voting allowed two weeks before it.
If appealed, the case could ultimately be decided by Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.
Lucas Vebber, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, hailed the ruling.
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another,” Vebber said. “This decision does just that.”
veryGood! (71564)
Related
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Inside Clean Energy: Flow Batteries Could Be a Big Part of Our Energy Storage Future. So What’s a Flow Battery?
- Harry Styles Reacts to Tennis Star Elina Monfils Giving Up Concert Tickets Amid Wimbledon Run
- With Fossil Fuel Companies Facing Pressure to Reduce Carbon Emissions, Private Equity Is Buying Up Their Aging Oil, Gas and Coal Assets
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- 'He will be sadly missed': Drag race driver killed in high-speed crash in Ohio
- Not coming to a screen near you — viewers will soon feel effects of the writers strike
- Kim Kardashian Is Freaking Out After Spotting Mystery Shadow in Her Selfie
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- A new pop-up flea market in LA makes space for plus-size thrift shoppers
Ranking
- Sam Taylor
- Supreme Court says 1st Amendment entitles web designer to refuse same-sex wedding work
- Surfer Mikala Jones Dead at 44 After Surfing Accident
- Supreme Court kills Biden's student debt plan in a setback for millions of borrowers
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Inside Clean Energy: Navigating the U.S. Solar Industry’s Spring of Discontent
- Inside Clean Energy: Navigating the U.S. Solar Industry’s Spring of Discontent
- How Kyra Sedgwick Made Kevin Bacon's 65th Birthday a Perfect Day
Recommendation
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Police investigating after woman's remains found in 3 suitcases in Delray Beach
Madonna Breaks Silence on Her Health After Hospitalization for Bacterial Infection
Traveling over the Fourth of July weekend? So is everyone else
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
From no bank to neobank
All My Children Star Jeffrey Carlson Dead at 48
The Energy Transition Runs Into a Ditch in Rural Ohio