Current:Home > ScamsOptions Trading Strategies: Classification by Strike Prices - Insights by Bertram Charlton -AssetLink
Options Trading Strategies: Classification by Strike Prices - Insights by Bertram Charlton
View
Date:2025-04-13 15:28:46
Options by strike price classification
When comparing the strike price to the current stock price, there are two scenarios: higher than the current stock price (Covered) and lower than the current stock price (Naked). So, options with different strike prices can be classified into 8 types:
Long Covered Call
Buying a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Call
Buying a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Call
Selling a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Call
Selling a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Long Covered Put
Buying a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Put
Buying a put option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Put
Selling a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Put
Selling a put option with a strike price < stock price.
The reason for this classification is that the significance behind whether the strike price is higher (Covered) or lower (Naked) than the stock price is very different.
Long Naked Call
Let’s take Long Naked Call (buying a call option with a strike price < stock price) as an example. I believe Long Naked Call is essentially like adding extra leverage to buying a stock.
For example, let’s say a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $50. Since the strike price is $50 and the stock price is $100, the strike price < stock price, making this a Long Naked Call. Because the option’s strike price is $50 less than the stock price, the premium for this option won’t be cheap; it will definitely be above $50. If the premium were less than $50, your cost to exercise (strike price + premium) would be less than the stock price, which wouldn’t make sense for the counterparty. For someone to be willing to trade with you, the premium must be higher than $50.
Let’s assume the premium is $60. So, the cost to buy this option is $60. In this case:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $40, and the return is 40/60 = +67%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $60, and the return is -60/60 = -100%.
Now, if you bought the stock instead of the option:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $50, and the return is 50/100 = +50%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $50, and the return is -50/100 = -50%.
As you can see, compared to directly buying the stock, your return with the option is almost like having double leverage. But it’s not exactly double leverage because the premium has a time value, which means you paid an extra cost.
Long Covered Call
The significance behind a Long Covered Call is quite different.
For example, if a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $110, this is a Long Covered Call because the strike price > stock price. The premium for this option won’t be as high as in the previous example. Let’s assume it’s $10.
So, if you buy this option for $10:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, because the strike price + premium will be greater than the stock price and the strike price is fixed at $110, the premium will rise to at least $40. The return is (150-110-10)/10 = +300%.
If the stock rises 20% to $120, your return is (120-110-10)/10 = 0%.
If the stock rises 10% to $110, your return is (110-110-10)/10 = -100%.
In fact, since your strike price is $110, unless the stock rises more than 10%, your return is -100%.
As you can see, the leverage effect of a Long Covered Call is very different from that of a Long Naked Call.
veryGood! (2119)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Untangling the Wildest Spice Girls Stories: Why Geri Halliwell Really Left, Mel B's Bombshells and More
- iCarly's Jerry Trainor Shares His Thoughts on Jennette McCurdy's Heartbreaking Memoir
- It's time to have the 'Fat Talk' with our kids — and ourselves
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Clean Energy Could Fuel Most Countries by 2050, Study Shows
- CDC tracking new COVID variant EU.1.1
- CDC tracking new COVID variant EU.1.1
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- A woman in Ecuador was mistakenly declared dead. A doctor says these cases are rare
Ranking
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Judge tells Rep. George Santos' family members co-signing bond involves exercising moral control over congressman
- How a secret Delaware garden suddenly reemerged during the pandemic
- Brittany Cartwright Reacts to Critical Comments About Her Appearance in Mirror Selfie
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Shift to Clean Energy Could Save Millions Who Die From Pollution
- Defense arguments are set to open in a landmark climate case brought by Montana youth
- It's never too late to explore your gender identity. Here's how to start
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Honeybee deaths rose last year. Here's why farmers would go bust without bees
Half the World’s Sandy Beaches May Disappear by Century’s End, Climate Study Says
Senate 2020: In Kansas, a Democratic Climate Hawk Closes in on a Republican Climate Skeptic
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
New Leadership Team Running InsideClimate News
Keeping Up With the Love Lives of The Kardashian-Jenner Family
Ohio River May Lose Its Regional Water Quality Standards, Vote Suggests