Current:Home > MarketsTexas’ floating Rio Grande barrier can stay for now, court rules as larger legal battle persists -AssetLink
Texas’ floating Rio Grande barrier can stay for now, court rules as larger legal battle persists
View
Date:2025-04-16 18:42:51
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A floating barrier in the Rio Grande meant to discourage migrants from trying to cross from Mexico into Texas can stay for now, a full federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
The decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a previous decision by a panel of the court. The ruling is the latest development in a standoff between Texas and President Joe Biden’s administration over immigration on the state’s 1,200-mile (1,930-kilometer) border with Mexico.
In December, a divided panel of the 5th Circuit had sided with a federal district judge in Texas who said the buoys must be moved. The entire appeals court on Tuesday said the court abused its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction.
The broader lawsuit in district court is set for a trial beginning on Aug. 6, where the Biden administration accuses Texas of violating the federal Rivers and Harbor Act. Vanita Gupta, associate attorney general, said Texas “flouted federal law” and risks damaging U.S. foreign policy.
The series of linked, concrete-anchored buoys stretches roughly the length of three soccer fields in one of the busiest hotspots for illegal border crossings. The state installed it along the international border with Mexico between the Texas border city of Eagle Pass and Piedras Negras, Coahuila.
The Justice Department had asked a federal court to order Texas to remove the buoys, saying the water barrier poses humanitarian and environmental concerns along the international boundary. Abbott has waved off the lawsuit as he is cheered on by conservative allies who are eager for cases that would empower states to take on more aggressive immigration measures.
The barrier is one focal point in the legal disputes over border control between Democratic President Joe Biden and Abbott. The Biden administration also is fighting for the right to cut razor-wire fencing at the border and for access to a city park at the border that the state fenced off.
veryGood! (1214)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Missing resident from Davenport, Iowa, building collapse found dead, officials confirm
- Rising Seas Are Flooding Norfolk Naval Base, and There’s No Plan to Fix It
- Today’s Climate: April 29, 2010
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- As Climate Talks Open, Federal Report Exposes U.S. Credibility Gap
- You'll Flip a Table Over These Real Housewives of New Jersey Season 13 Reunion Looks
- Some bars are playing a major role in fighting monkeypox in the LGBTQ community
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Get a $39 Deal on $118 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Skincare Products
Ranking
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Billie Lourd Calls Out Carrie Fisher’s Siblings for Public “Attacks” in Rare Statement
- Over half of people infected with the omicron variant didn't know it, a study finds
- Henry Shaw
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- How realistic are the post-Roe abortion workarounds that are filling social media?
- Why keeping girls in school is a good strategy to cope with climate change
- Flash Deal: Save $621 on the Aeropilates Reformer Machine
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Today’s Climate: May 6, 2010
Protecting Norfolk from Flooding Won’t Be Cheap: Army Corps Releases Its Plan
Directors Guild of America reaches truly historic deal with Hollywood studios
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Whistleblower Quits with Scathing Letter Over Trump Interior Dept. Leadership
10 Sweet Treats to Send Mom Right in Time for Mother's Day
16 migrants flown to California on chartered jet and left outside church: Immoral and disgusting