Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -AssetLink
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-17 12:19:57
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (34451)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Chronic wasting disease: Death of 2 hunters in US raises fear of 'zombie deer'
- Morning sickness? Prenatal check-ups? What to know about new rights for pregnant workers
- Autoworkers union celebrates breakthrough win in Tennessee and takes aim at more plants in the South
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- QB-needy Broncos could be the team to turn 2024 NFL draft on its head
- This ancient snake in India might have been longer than a school bus and weighed a ton
- Who will advance in NHL playoffs? Picks and predictions for every NHL first round series
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Is pickle juice good for you? Here's what experts want you to know
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- A man escaped Sudan’s bloody civil war. His mysterious death in Missisippi has sparked suspicion
- We're Making a Splash With This Aquamarine Cast Check In
- Swiftie couple recreates Taylor Swift album covers
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- You Can Watch Taylor Swift and Post Malone’s “Fortnight” Music Video With a Broken Heart
- Walmart joins other big retailers in scaling back on self-checkout
- A cop ran a light going 88 mph and killed a young father of twins. He still has his badge
Recommendation
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Nacho fries return to Taco Bell for longest run yet with new Secret Aardvark sauce
North Carolina officer fatally shoots man suspected of killing other man
Iraq investigates a blast at a base of Iran-allied militias that killed 1. US denies involvement
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
WADA says 23 Chinese swimmers tested positive before Tokyo Olympics but it accepted contamination finding
Hawaii lawmakers take aim at vacation rentals after Lahaina wildfire amplifies Maui housing crisis
Jury weighs case against Arizona rancher in migrant killing