Current:Home > MarketsPredictIQ-Senate Democrats to try to ban bump stocks after Supreme Court ruling -AssetLink
PredictIQ-Senate Democrats to try to ban bump stocks after Supreme Court ruling
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-09 11:51:01
Washington — Senate Democrats on PredictIQTuesday will try to pass legislation that would restore a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, an accessory that enables semi-automatic weapons to shoot at a very rapid pace, after last week's Supreme Court decision striking down the ban.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Sunday he'd bring up the legislation for a vote under unanimous consent, a procedure in which a measure passes so long as no lawmaker objects. He confirmed in a Senate floor speech Tuesday that Sen. Martin Heinrich, a New Mexico Democrat, would seek passage of his bill banning bump stocks later in the afternoon.
"What today's bill does is return things to the status quo set by Donald Trump, saying bump stocks are dangerous and should be prohibited," Schumer said.
Heinrich said Tuesday there's "no legitimate use for a bump stock."
"There's no law enforcement application for a bump stock. There's no military application for a bump stock. There's no self-defense application for a bump stock. These things are, like, tailor-made for mass shootings," he said.
Schumer, a New York Democrat, called the bump stock ban "common sense" and urged Republicans to support it. He said Senate Republicans supported banning bump stocks when the Trump administration sought to outlaw the devices and criticized those who have come out against it today.
"Are my Republican colleagues serious? Do they really think banning bump stocks is some kind of stunt?" he said. "Again, they should tell that to the people of Nevada who have dead relatives because of bump stocks."
One Republican, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, has signed on as a co-sponsor of the bump stock legislation.
The Supreme Court's conservative justices found that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives overstepped its authority in prohibiting the devices, concluding that a semi-automatic rifle outfitted with a bump stock is not the same as a machine gun because the trigger still must be released and reengaged to fire each shot. Machine guns, which are banned under federal law, can fire continuously by a single pull of the trigger.
The ban, which went into effect in 2019, came after a gunman, who used semi-automatic rifles equipped with the accessories, killed 60 people at a Las Vegas music festival in one of the deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history.
"A bump stock does not convert a semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun any more than a shooter with a lightning-fast trigger finger does," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.
In a concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the Las Vegas massacre strengthened the case for changing the law to ban bump stocks.
"There is a simple remedy for the disparate treatment of bump stocks and machine guns," he wrote, saying that "Congress can amend the law."
President Biden called on Congress to pass a ban in wake of the Supreme Court's decision, saying he would sign it into law.
"Americans should not have to live in fear of this mass devastation," Mr. Biden said in a statement Friday.
Laura Garrison contributed reporting.
Caitlin YilekCaitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.
TwitterveryGood! (12)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Why Emily Blunt Is Taking a Year Off From Acting
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Beauty Steal: Get 10 Breakout-Clearing Sheet Masks for $13
- TikTok’s Favorite Hair Wax Stick With 16,100+ 5-Star Reviews Is $8 for Amazon Prime Day 2023
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Colleen Ballinger's Remaining Miranda Sings Tour Dates Canceled Amid Controversy
- Maryland’s Largest County Just Banned Gas Appliances in Most New Buildings—But Not Without Some Concessions
- This Arctic US Air Base Has Its Eyes on Russia. But Climate is a Bigger Threat
- Small twin
- A New Push Is on in Chicago to Connect Urban Farmers With Institutional Buyers Like Schools and Hospitals
Ranking
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Science Day at COP27 Shows That Climate Talks Aren’t Keeping Pace With Planetary Physics
- The Bodysuits Everyone Loves Are All Under $20 for Amazon Prime Day 2023
- The IRS will stop making most unannounced visits to taxpayers' homes and businesses
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Decarbonization Program Would Eliminate Most Emissions in Southwest Pennsylvania by 2050, a New Study Finds
- These 25 Amazon Prime Day 2023 Deals Are Big Sellout Risks: Laneige, Yeti, Color Wow, Kindle, and More
- NOAA Climate Scientists Cruise Washington and Baltimore for Hotspots—of Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollutants
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Amazon Prime Day 2023: Get a Portable Garment Steamer With 65,000+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews for Just $28
After a Decade, Federal Officials Tighten Guidelines on Air Pollution
Could the U.S. still see a recession? A handy primer about the confusing economy
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
In-N-Out Burger bans employees in 5 states from wearing masks
West Baltimore Residents, Students Have Mixed Feelings About Water Quality After E. Coli Contamination
Across New York, a Fleet of Sensor-Equipped Vehicles Tracks an Array of Key Pollutants